The proponents of the Marijuana Initiative to change California law to legalize marijuana turned in their signatures at election offices throughout the state in their bid to qualify for the November 2010 ballot. So what! It’s one of many initiatives in circulation.
What’s different? This is the first time in California history that an electronic signature has been submitted to qualify an initiative petition. The signature was turned in on a jump drive.
Chief Elections Officer Warren Slocum rejected the electronic signature on the basis that the signature failed to meet code requirements. It won’t invalidate the initiative’s other signatures, but it does open the door to a whole new ballgame.
Will the courts will allow this kind of technology to be applied in the world of elections?
Slocum, a believer in technology, looks forward to bringing the world of Elections into the 21st century– if the court allows it. He went on to explain, “Election law did not anticipate this method of signature gathering and it does not offer guidance in this area,” Slocum continued. Different code sections and regulations offer divergent approaches to the use and acceptance of electronic signatures.
“This form of signature gathering could be transformative,” said Slocum.
It will take less time and money to verify signatures – not to mention the mountains of paper petitions and energy used to make that paper and print the petitions. And, this technology makes it possible for signature gatherers to widely distribute petitions at little or no cost – making the political process that much more accessible.
We shall see.